How Comedians Fought off the Fear of Nuclear Power Energy
In southwestern France is Civaux, a stereotypical countryside village with a small school, a square and a church. On a usual day, Monsieur, a local baker, is busy turning out croissants and baguettes even before dawn. Soon after, teacher Rene Barc checks-in in the small community school. The same community also has a hairdresser, blacksmith, a general store, a post office, and a number of bars. However, overlooking the pretty settlement are two colossal chilling towers from a nuclear power plant-half-mile away still under erection. On completion, Civaux nuclear power plant will become the 56th operational power plant. France will generate 76% of its energy from nuclear energy. Since its adoption of the nuclear energy policy France satisfies its energy demands and even exports power to other European countries. Additionally, French authorities have educated people on the benefits of nuclear power and the associated risks. Currently opinion polls indicate that French people are strongly in favor of nuclear energy. The technology is potentially hazardous and requires adept management. As Chernobyl exhibited, the Russians were not “up to the task. However the French engineers are.
A number of top American comedians have employed this illustrative French example to run television shows on how people need to adopt nuclear power and end the traditional perception of nuclear as extremely dangerous source of power. Who else could thwart such fears among Americans through comic ways except a number of top comedians? The glossy and comic television publicity campaigns emphasize the association between nuclear power and the electric power that makes contemporary life promising.
It was hilarious how to see the comedians help the Americans laugh-off their fears. French people used to be many Americans have adverse imagery fears of radioactivity and tragedy from historical accidents associated with nuclear energy. The difference is that France embarked on economic, cultural, and political campaigns to thwart these fears. Nuclear energy happens to be one of the least armful energy sources for our environment. It would be a necessary approach to provision of sustainable energy if the world has to avoid hazardous climate change.
Using facts the comedians convinced people that the ever increasing energy demand will keep on placing grave burdens on the natural resources, hence threatening earth’s rich biodiversity unless people will agree to venture in nuclear energy as a significant element of the energy mix. They managed to use research by former UK government chief biologists as well as some other 65 biologists, who called for more nuclear power plants to be established as a central part of world plan to safeguard the environment and the wild life.
Conclusively, the comedians convinced Americans that conciliations and trade-offs are unavoidable, and entail encouraging energy combinations that seek least environmental destruction. Humanity cannot afford to risk comprehensive failure to deal with energy-related biodiversity effects because of prejudiced ideals and notions that only create fear. Acknowledging the “historical antipathy towards nuclear-powered energy” it is time people weigh the pros and cons of various energy sources in combating climate change. There is need to deviate from the traditional fears created from past accidents caused by nuclear power, and use objective evidence and pragmatic trade-off instead of depending entirely on idealistic perceptions of what is ‘green’.
Fighting off such traditional fears can be done creatively by comedians who can use comedy to educate people on any societal issue. These are top rated comedians whom we come across in entertainment moments. If you require a top rated comedian for any occasions please visit comedians at LOL agency. You will get a chance to meet the right comedian for your occasion!